Research question

This study tested whether multispectral drone imagery, terrain attributes, and weather variables could predict surface soil moisture.

Methods

During my doctoral research at the University of California, Merced, I worked with Teamrat Ghezzehei, Josh Viers, Anna Fryjoff-Hung, and Andreas Anderson to combine multispectral drone imagery with terrain attributes and weather variables. We compared machine-learning methods and examined which inputs mattered to the predictions.

A fixed-wing drone collecting imagery over the study landscape

Photogrammetry produced a 10 cm digital elevation model. We derived terrain attributes at several scales and combined them with reflectance, precipitation, and potential evapotranspiration. We used soil moisture measurements collected on the ground to train and evaluate the models.

Measured and predicted volumetric soil moisture on the testing sets, with a one-to-one line, marginal box plots, and model evaluation metrics.
Testing-set measured and predicted soil moisture across the 30 models. Araya et al. (2021), Fig. 7, CC BY 4.0. Click the figure to view full size.

Findings

The published study found that adding terrain and hydrological variables improved predictions compared with imagery alone. Precipitation, red-band reflectance, potential evapotranspiration, and topographic position were important predictors. The paper also reports larger errors at higher soil moisture levels and a lack of training observations above about 40% volumetric moisture.

Collecting soil moisture measurements in the field

Publication

Read the 2021 paper in Hydrology and Earth System Sciences.